JPMorgan’s Bearish Outlook on Circle Internet Group and Tesla: Key Risks & Catalysts
In late July 2025, JPMorgan Chase analysts stunned Wall Street by cutting their year-end price targets on two high-profile names: Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL) and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). They now see steep drawdowns of 56% and 64%, respectively, between today and December. Below, we unpack the rationale, check the consensus view, and highlight the metrics investors should monitor as both blockchain and EV markets evolve.
Analyst Price Targets & Implied Downsides
Ken Worthington at JPMorgan set a year-end target of $80 for Circle, down from a July closing near $182. That implies a 56% downside. Ryan Brinkman cut Tesla’s target to $115, implying a 64% fall from its recent $321 share price.
By comparison, the Wall Street consensus is far less bearish. The average target on Circle sits at roughly $181.50 (flat to current levels), and Tesla’s consensus target is ~$310 (a 3% downside). This gulf underscores JPMorgan’s contrarian stance within the analyst community.
Why Circle Internet Group (CRCL) Looks Vulnerable
Circle is best known as the issuer of USDC, the second-largest stablecoin by market capitalization. Its business model currently relies heavily on interest income from the reserve assets backing those tokens.
In Q1 2025, Circle reported 59% revenue growth to $579 million and a 60% jump in adjusted EBITDA to $122 million, driven by a surge in USDC circulation but offset by a lower interest rate environment.
With Fed rate cuts on the horizon, yields on USDC reserves could compress further, squeezing Circle’s core revenue driver. While the company recently launched its Circle Payments Network to diversify into payment processing, that business is still nascent.
Investors should watch Circle’s upcoming earnings releases and S-1 follow-ups at the SEC’s EDGAR database (https://www.sec.gov/edgar) for any signs of margin erosion or traction in non-interest lines.
Why Tesla (TSLA) Faces Headwinds
Tesla climbed over 160% since early 2023 but has lost material market share in the global EV market this year. Competition from legacy automakers and emerging Chinese brands has intensified pricing pressure and cut into Tesla’s unit growth.
In March, JPMorgan predicted Tesla Q1 deliveries would dip 20% year-over-year to 355,000 units, its lowest quarterly volume in three years, largely due to waning European demand amid geopolitical backlash over Elon Musk’s public stances.
Boycotts and consumer protests have reportedly driven a 50% year-over-year decline in Tesla sales in Europe, and a 35.5% drop in Australia/New Zealand, per the Electric Vehicle Council of Australia.
On the flip side, Tesla’s entry into commercial autonomous ride-hailing services could unlock a new revenue stream if regulators and technology hurdles align. Investors should track delivery figures at Tesla’s IR site (https://ir.tesla.com) and regulatory updates on self-driving tests.
Consensus vs. JPMorgan: A Wide Divide
Most analysts on Bloomberg and Yahoo Finance remain neutral to mildly positive on both names:
- Average Circle target: $181.50 (–0.3% downside)
- Average Tesla target: $310 (–3% downside)
This dispersion of forecasts highlights the polarized debate over how quickly stablecoin yields will erode and whether Tesla’s growth avenues can offset its near-term volume slump.
Key Metrics to Monitor
For Circle Internet Group:
- Reserve yield spread vs. Fed funds rate
- USDC & EURC circulating supply (https://circle.com/en/usdc)
- Progress on Circle Payments Network adoption
For Tesla:
- Global delivery trends (region-by-region breakdown)
- Autonomous ride-hailing rollouts and regulatory approvals
- Gross margin per vehicle and energy storage segment growth
Potential Catalysts & Risks
Stablecoin legislation in Washington could either shore up confidence in Circle’s model or impose reserve requirements that tighten margins. FollowSEC rule-making updates at https://www.sec.gov/news/press.
For Tesla, breakthroughs in battery technology or a surprise cost cut from new Gigafactory output could reinvigorate investor sentiment. Conversely, further social media controversies involving Musk may deepen regional boycotts.
Conclusion
JPMorgan’s steep downside targets for Circle Internet Group and Tesla challenge the prevailing optimism on these high-growth names. While Circle must prove it can replace interest income with scalable payments fees, Tesla needs to arrest its delivery decline and capitalize on new mobility services.
By tracking the metrics and catalysts outlined above, investors can position themselves ahead of year-end—whether they agree with JPMorgan’s bearish forecast or side with the broader analyst consensus.
Sources: